due to your primarily apologetic approach to man’s knowledge-you do not develop it as such—at least not as far as I know. It is exactly this fourth type of revelation (presupposing the other types) that I require for a philosophical (as well as for a particular scientific) approach to man’s knowledge. B.3.3.1. Objections may be raised against calling this fourth type also a type of revelation, because revelation is here used in an uncommon sense. For it is not a revelation of God himself to man,